It is very roughly similar to Times New Roman, but with a smaller x-height and a similar but more spare-looking em width. Caslon, any of the variations of Caslon, is a serif font. In the current instance, the font-family you have described does not meet this criterion. This will result in the least change of appearance if the visitor's user agent must fall back to an alternate. It is impractical to provide alt or title attributes for bodies of text (paragraphs, lists, definitions, etc.) represented as image, which shoots the accessibility of your site right in the backside.Īnother thing you will want to consider, if you decide to define a font-family (which you may certainly do), is to make your alternative fonts have the same characteristics as the main font you wish to display. They are only appropriate, in a very limited sense of that word, for headings, titles, callouts, decoratives, etc. Do keep in mind, in addition to what Preston has suggested, that image-replaced fonts should not be used for bodies of text.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |